Which statement best describes OmniScript's modular architecture?

Which statement best describes OmniScript's modular architecture?

• A. The JSON metadata, templates, and data are separated
• B. The front end and back end are tightly coupled in a monolith
• C. Branding cannot be applied
• D. Data can only come from one source

Answer: (A)

OmniScript’s modular design rests on separating what defines the flow, how it’s shown, and where the data comes from. The JSON metadata defines the script’s steps and logic, templates dictate the UI structure and presentation, and the data portion pulls in information from various sources. This separation lets you reuse UI templates across scripts, swap or update data sources without rewriting the flow, and maintain each piece independently. It also supports pulling data from multiple sources and applying branding at the presentation layer, which wouldn’t fit if everything were tightly coupled in one monolithic block. So, describing the architecture as the JSON metadata, templates, and data being separated captures how OmniScript stays flexible and maintainable.

OmniScript’s modular design rests on separating what defines the flow, how it’s shown, and where the data comes from. The JSON metadata defines the script’s steps and logic, templates dictate the UI structure and presentation, and the data portion pulls in information from various sources. This separation lets you reuse UI templates across scripts, swap or update data sources without rewriting the flow, and maintain each piece independently. It also supports pulling data from multiple sources and applying branding at the presentation layer, which wouldn’t fit if everything were tightly coupled in one monolithic block. So, describing the architecture as the JSON metadata, templates, and data being separated captures how OmniScript stays flexible and maintainable.